On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:38:43 +1300 Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:58 -0500:5085: ------ all finished. Total of > > 10.295683 secs I asked the same question a year ago - and the answer from Jason was that the total time includes *getting* the message from remote SMTP. > Again - not standard Q-S... > > Sorry, can't help - maybe the author of the "st" patch can shed some light? It is a patch by Salvatore Toribio (http://xoomer.virgilio.it/j.toribio/qmail-scanner/). I don't think it is "guilty" in this case. Regards, Nerijus ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
