Re: verifying system binaries, a la R*dh*t

[Scott Ballantyne]

From: Vern Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's Dan's attitude.  Even after making all the allowances the guy from
> Redhat wanted, Redhat still didn't want to include qmail.  What that
> says to me is that Dan fundamentally offended someone and that someone
> couldn't get over it.
> 

It's *Dan's* attitude? This thread has just gone where no thread
should have gone. Comments like these, if made at all, should be made
privately. I happen to admire the way Dan interacts with people, which
I have only seen on the net, I admit. But on the net he's direct, he's
honest, and he's smart. When he's wrong, which he almost never is, he
admits it.

> While I'm not condoning holding personal grudges it says a lot about how
> Dan interacts with people--not well.
> 

If this is really what is going on then Redhat should grow up and
appreciate talent.

sdb