Mike Holling writes: > I doubt the distinction between "analog dialup" and > "cablemodem/DSL" will stick around for very long, and it's a short > step from "I'm going to ban dialups" to "I'm going to ban any IP > assigned to ISP end-users". It's "I'm going to ban any IP assigned to anonymous end-users", and what's the problem with that? Why should all IP addresses be treated with equal weight? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Re: I don't trust 'em. Tim Pierce
- Re: I don't trust 'em. James Smallacombe
- Re: I don't trust 'em. ddb
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rick Myers
- Re: Three solutions for spam ddb
- Re: Three solutions for spam Mike Holling
- Re: Three solutions for spam Sam
- Re: Three solutions for spam Paul J. Schinder
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam Paul J. Schinder
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam Sam
- RE: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam phil
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam phil
- Re: Three solutions for spam Mike Holling
- Re: Three solutions for spam phil
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam ddb
