> Why we are having this discussion? probably because some people, like to
> categorize people who send mail through dial up as spammers.
It's not a case of categorizing. The problem is that those who do send
mail directly from a dialup cannot be _distinguished_ from a spammer.
It's not an issue of whether or not it is a dialup. It is an issue of
whether or not it is an address with a generic or anonymous name associated
with it, which dialup ports generally have. By getting a fixed address
with a real name (even a 3rd level domain name is fine) and real MX records,
then it won't look like what we have been referring to as "dialup".
And if it takes political changes in your country to allow that to happen,
then that's what you'll need to do. My guess, however, is that perhaps it
can be expedited by contacting the right people and simply getting some
technical competency in place at the levels where management decisions are
being made.
In the mean time, the rest of the world is not going to wait for you to
catch up.
--
Phil Howard | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phil | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipal | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dot | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
