On Sun, 7 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why we are having this discussion? probably because some people, like to
> > categorize people who send mail through dial up as spammers.
>
> It's not a case of categorizing. The problem is that those who do send
> mail directly from a dialup cannot be _distinguished_ from a spammer.
Then why should they be automatically labelled as spammers? Also, people
who send mail through relays cannot be distinguished from spammers also.
> It's not an issue of whether or not it is a dialup. It is an issue of
> whether or not it is an address with a generic or anonymous name associated
> with it, which dialup ports generally have. By getting a fixed address
Can u define anonymous?? (something that doesn't isn't reversed resolved?)
> with a real name (even a 3rd level domain name is fine) and real MX records,
> then it won't look like what we have been referring to as "dialup".
I don't understand also,why they should have MX records also.
> And if it takes political changes in your country to allow that to happen,
> then that's what you'll need to do. My guess, however, is that perhaps it
> can be expedited by contacting the right people and simply getting some
> technical competency in place at the levels where management decisions are
> being made.
Isn't that a bit little lyrical?
> In the mean time, the rest of the world is not going to wait for you to
> catch up.
As long as they are reasonable, i don't see any reason to. :-)
--
Tiago Pascoal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX : +351-1-7273394
Politicamente incorrecto, e membro (nao muito) proeminente da geracao rasca.
