[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Several turnkey system vendors have converted to qmail.
>
> This is besides the point. Redhat ships sendmail because you are
> uncooperative. This is a security disaster which is entirely YOUR fault.
>
This conversation is making me yearn for reposts of FAQ 5.4. I don't
use Linux. I don't use Redhat - these conversations have made it even
more clear to me that I never want to use Linux or Redhat. Why would
anyone want to use a product that placed vendor convenience over
excellence? I run qmail in a non-standard location and it works just
fine. Dan provides a binary editor to fix uids, and I have used it
once or twice to schlep binaries between different systems. It would
seem trivially easy for a competent distributor to adapt to both of
these conditions. I know I could write an install script that would
handle this... To blame djb for someone else shipping sendmail
is, well, it's hysterical.
Enough is enough already...
sdb
