On 23-Dec-98 05:20:37, Russ Allbery wrote something about "Re: Frivolous forking". I 
just couldn't help replying to it, thus:

> I hope that anyone who intends to do this as part of their security policy
> uses tripwire rather than relying on RPM.  Tripwire is not a package
[cut]

   Which is all great until the tripwire database itself is tampered with. A
competent intruder would wipe it out as the first thing (s)he does. It is a
darn sight more difficult to hack the MD5 sums on your Redhat Linux CDROM.

> RPM's verification thing is nice, but I really wouldn't rely on it as a
> replacement for tripwire.

   And I would not trust my tripwire database once my system has been
compromised.

Regards,

/������������������������������T�����������������������������������������\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen     | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Registered Phase5 developer  | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/   |
| A4000, 775 kkeys/s (RC5-64)  | "ThrustMe" on XPilot and EFnet IRC      |
|   Life starts at '030, fun starts at '040, impotence starts at '86.    |

Reply via email to