[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 January 1999 at 09:45:51 -0600
> Dax Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 January 1999 at 00:02:27 -0700
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Dax Kelson wrote:
> >
> > > If the list has a < 20 second turn around like the qmail list, those
> > > things wouldn't happen.
> >
> > Actually it is more like 1-2 seconds.
>
> It doesn't feel nearly that fast to me. I just happen to have the
> list copy of a message I sent still lying around. Unless I'm
> overlooking something important, comparing the sent and received
> timestamps from my qmail (on the same system, so same clock) should be
> a reasonable measure of the round-trip time on list messages.
>
> The headers are attached, but for this one message it was 6 seconds.
And the turnaround on THAT message was 5 seconds.
Received: (qmail 629 invoked from network); 13 Jan 1999 15:45:57 -0000
Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (131.193.178.181)
by gw.ddb.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 1999 15:45:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 24427 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Jan 1999 15:45:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 9781 invoked from network); 13 Jan 1999 15:45:42 -0000
Received: from gw.ddb.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by muncher.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 13 Jan 1999 15:45:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 624 invoked by uid 501); 13 Jan 1999 15:45:52 -0000
I promise I'll stop now :-)
--
David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ddb.com/~ddb (photos, sf) Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ The Ouroboros Bookworms
Join the 20th century before it's too late!
