Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail

[Adam D. McKenna]

On Tue, Dec 29, 1998 at 04:25:55PM -0500, Sam wrote:
> Not when they have a functional MTA available, that doesn't come with any
> strings attached, that quietly installs itself, non-relaying out of the
> box, and will even do certain things that Qmail cannot do, such as reject
> non-resolvable envelope sender addresses, reject delivery attempts to
> non-existent local users, and support RBL lookups with a single
> configuration switch.  There's absolutely no reason for Red Hat to switch
> to Qmail, so let's just stop beating a dead horse.

qmail doesn't reject delivery attempts to nonexistant local users??  I guess this is 
true if you have a .qmail-default in ~alias, but otherwise the message will bounce, no?

--Adam