On Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 02:20:44PM -0500, Peter C. Norton wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 01:05:17PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote: > > What I do not get is why RH does not have an "unusual" section where > > they would distribute software that does not fit their distribution > > policies---similarly to debian's "nonfree" section. > > They have the contrib setup. You can offer to maintain a package, and > they'll put it up on contrib.redhat.com. Well, when Dan's distribution policy got formulated, RH took out both the src and the binary rpm from the contrib tree. Also, I think the contrib tree is not distributed on the CD ROM. -- --- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
- Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Bill Parker
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Peter C. Norton
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Mate Wierdl
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Mate Wierdl
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Peter C. Norton
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Justin Bell
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Justin Bell
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Peter C. Norton
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
