Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail

[Rask Ingemann Lambertsen]

On 29-Dec-98 22:30:41, Adam D. McKenna wrote something about "Re: Why Red Hat is not 
distributing qmail". I just couldn't help replying to it, thus:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 1998 at 04:25:55PM -0500, Sam wrote:
[sendmail]
>> box, and will even do certain things that Qmail cannot do, such as reject
>> non-resolvable envelope sender addresses, reject delivery attempts to
>> non-existent local users, and support RBL lookups with a single

> qmail doesn't reject delivery attempts to nonexistant local users??

   No, in fact it doesn't.

> I guess this is true if you have a .qmail-default in ~alias,

   Doesn't make a difference.

> but otherwise the message will bounce, no?

   Yes, the message will bounce if it cannot be delivered.

Regards,

/������������������������������T�����������������������������������������\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen     | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Registered Phase5 developer  | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/   |
| A4000, 775 kkeys/s (RC5-64)  | "ThrustMe" on XPilot and EFnet IRC      |
|   Which is worse: Ignorance or apathy?   Who knows...  Who cares...    |