Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail

[ddb]

Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 January 1999 at 16:12:49 GMT
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 > > And checking the sender is fairly expensive, too.
 > 
 > No it's really not.  You've got a caching name server on the local net,
 > right?

Yes; but it's not that likely that I've got the sender's domain
already cached.  It's probably an actual additional DNS lookup.
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet                                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ddb.com/~ddb (photos, sf) Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ The Ouroboros Bookworms
Join the 20th century before it's too late!