D. J. Bernstein writes: > > envelope sender checking is the _norm_ outside of Qmail world. > [ ... ] > > it does stop its share of the bulk. > > I took 30 envelope sender domains from Bruce Guenter's 1999 spam archive > and fed them through mail.sendmail.com: > > aol.com is allowed. . . . > alsa.jcu.cz is allowed. > > The original 30 pieces of spam have been slashed to a mere 28. Amazing! I wasn't aware that the spam archive included spam people didn't actually receive, because their ISP rejected unresolvable domains. Every spam in my spam archive also has resolvable return addresses - golly, shazam! How about that!!
- Vendors and tied hands Len Budney
- Re: Vendors and tied hands Edward S. Marshall
- rblsmtpd error codes D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... johnjohn
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... ddb
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... Sam
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... ddb
- Example of the anti-fax effect D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Example of the anti-fax effect Sam
- Re: Example of the anti-fax effect Russell Nelson
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... Bart Blanquart
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributin... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification and ... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
