Keith Burdis wrote/schrieb/scribsit: > Remember that we're talking about sending one message to a large number of > addresses on the same remote host. In general qmail is faster, but I think in > this case any MTA that does multiple rcpt to's will be quicker. AFAIK, sendmail has a limit of "RCPT TO"s it will send in one connection. So in this situation a message will be split into several multi-rcpt connections. Will these connections ocurr one at a time or simultaneously? The former would impose a great speed penalty compared to qmail. Anyway, the One True Answer on this topic is: "profile, don't speculate". Stefan
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Oliver Thuns
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Fred Lindberg
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Keith Burdis
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- helping qmail vs. lame MTAs John R. Levine
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Marc Slemko
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Mark Delany
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Keith Burdis
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Stefan Paletta
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... ddb
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Richard Letts
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again&... Craig I. Hagan
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Silver CHEN
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again&... Keith Burdis
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Marc Slemko
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Keith Burdis
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Marc Slemko
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... ddb
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Timothy L. Mayo
