On Mon 1999-04-12 (11:41), Dave Sill wrote: > "Fred Lindberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >qmail will always be faster than sendmail [unless you send one message > >to a large number of addresses on the same remote host]. > > No, qmail will usually win here, too, because sendmail serializes. > Sendmail only wins when the message is huge. Sendmail will win if you use multiple rcpt-to's. - Keith > -Dave -- Keith Burdis - MSc (Com Sci) - Rhodes University, South Africa Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~keith/ IRC : Panthras JAPH "Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from a perl script" Standard disclaimer. ---
- [Q] qmail speed "again" Silver CHEN
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Peter van Dijk
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Peter van Dijk
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Samuel Dries-Daffner
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Oliver Thuns
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Fred Lindberg
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Keith Burdis
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Dave Sill
- helping qmail vs. lame MTAs John R. Levine
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again... Marc Slemko
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "a... Mark Delany
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "a... Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again... Keith Burdis
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "a... Stefan Paletta
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "a... ddb
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "a... Richard Letts
- Re: [Q] qmail speed &qu... Craig I. Hagan
