> I've read all the articles about the topic 'qmail speed'. Now I'm >wonder > that if qmail can do this too? If the design spirit of qmail can't >afford > such high-loading task in short time, then sendmail takes the chance >back. qmail, exim and postfix are all much faster than sendmail and you should compare these 3 MTAs. Maybe you could also take a look at postfix, it's more like sendmail and I found it very easy to understand (I also like qmail very much and it's simple too, but different from other MTAs).
- [Q] qmail speed "again" Silver CHEN
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Peter van Dijk
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Peter van Dijk
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Samuel Dries-Daffner
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Oliver Thuns
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Fred Lindberg
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again" Keith Burdis
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"... Dave Sill
- helping qmail vs. lame MTAs John R. Levine
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again... Marc Slemko
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "a... Mark Delany
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "a... Dave Sill
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "again... Keith Burdis
- Re: [Q] qmail speed "a... Stefan Paletta
