James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Selective filtering is ALL about pattern-matching. Correct, which is why it is flawed. If pattern matching were applied uniformly, then soon all spam will be 100% 822-compliant, and will originate only from hosts with valid MX records, and with exactly one envelope recipient and one envelope sender--which will be a valid email address. What will you match on then? Len. -- A man's pride shall bring him low: but honour shall uphold the humble in spirit. --Proverbs 29:23
- RE: Three solutions for spam Bo Fussing
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- Re: Three solutions for spam Peter van Dijk
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam Vince Vielhaber
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- Re: Three solutions for spam Luca Olivetti
- Re: Pattern-matching and filtering Len Budney
- Re: Pattern-matching and filtering James Smallacombe
- Re: Pattern-matching and filtering Tim Pierce
- RE: Three solutions for spam Jeff Hayward
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam ddb
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- Re: Three solutions for spam Tim Pierce
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
