On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Len Budney wrote: True, but even factually-based prejudice, when based on _correlation_ rather than _causation_, is mighty risky business. It isn't prejudice, it is prevention. The analogy I use is communicable disease - it is universally acknowledged (at least in the US) that for the maintenance of public health it is justified that schools, for example, must exclude students who can not affirm that they have been vaccinated against some diseases. This policy excludes many people who have never been sick in their life, who aren't disease carriers, simply on the basis that they *can't be proven* disease-free. This is not prejudice at all. -- Jeff Hayward
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam Vince Vielhaber
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam James Smallacombe
- Re: Three solutions for spam Luca Olivetti
- Pattern-matching and filtering Len Budney
- Re: Pattern-matching and filtering James Smallacombe
- Re: Pattern-matching and filtering Tim Pierce
- RE: Three solutions for spam Jeff Hayward
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- RE: Three solutions for spam ddb
- RE: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- Re: Three solutions for spam Tim Pierce
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
- RE: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
- RE: Three solutions for spam Stefaan A Eeckels
- Re: Three solutions for spam ppiamdn
