> From: A Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:30:26 -0800 (PST)
>
>
> Thanks Chris. Now that begs the question of why I should use multilog
> instead of syslog which does datestamp if you tell it to. It doesn't seem
> beneficial to add a superflous step. I apologize if this point seems
> irrelevant.
The reasoning is that logging should be low-overheard. (I happen to be in the
process of fighting with the fact that syslogd on my system likes to use 98%
of the CPU and would much prefer if everything on my system used multilog.)
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues virCIO
http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ http://www.virCIO.Com
+1 512 432 4046 +1 512 374 0500
4314 Avenue C
O- Austin, TX 78751-3709
My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an
explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.
PGP signature
