On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 11:17:36PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > To be fair, some of this is caused by the fact that qmail is considerably > more verbose in its logging than what syslog really expects (and what > programs like sendmail do). (Hmm. Russ is a pretty smart guy so I may be wrong here, but...) I just did a count of a couple of (smallish) log files and I found that on average, qmail-send is logging 469 bytes per delivery and sendmail is logging 430 bytes per delivery. FWIW, the qmail logging is piping into logger. My strawman conclusion? qmail and sendmail log similar amounts of data per delivery. (qmail 1.03, sendmail 8.9.3) Regards.
- Re: multilog datestamping Dave Sill
- Re: multilog datestamping A Hoffman
- Re: multilog datestamping Chris Johnson
- Re: multilog datestamping A Hoffman
- Re: multilog datestamping Chris Garrigues
- Re: multilog datestamping Dave Sill
- Re: multilog datestamping Robbie Honerkamp
- Re: multilog datestamping Troy Morrison
- Re: multilog datestamping Russ Allbery
- Re: multilog datestamping Russ Allbery
- Re: multilog datestamping Mark Delany
- Re: multilog datestamping Russ Allbery
- Re: multilog datestamping Mark Delany
- Re: multilog datestamping Charles Cazabon
- Re: multilog datestamping Bruce Guenter
- Re: qmail logging tools Charles Cazabon
- Re: qmail logging tools Bruce Guenter
- Semd multipart messages with flash ... Carlo Gibertini
- Re: Semd multipart messages with fl... Dave Sill
- Re: multilog datestamping vogelke
- RE: multilog datestamping Tim Hunter
