| In short- you can get away with logging to syslogd on low volume | servers, but if you want to get the best performance out of your | server or if you're running high-volume mail services you need to drop | syslogd and move to multilog. I might disagree with this. My mail server is fairly low-volume (average concurrency for the past 8.95 days is 0.4 :) ) and it benefitted greatly from installing cyclog, not to mention I think my hard disks will live longer now. I imagine the improvement between syslog and multilog is similar. Troy
- multilog datestamping A Hoffman
- Re: multilog datestamping Mads E Eilertsen
- Re: multilog datestamping Dave Sill
- Re: multilog datestamping A Hoffman
- Re: multilog datestamping Chris Johnson
- Re: multilog datestamping A Hoffman
- Re: multilog datestamping Chris Garrigues
- Re: multilog datestamping Dave Sill
- Re: multilog datestamping Robbie Honerkamp
- Re: multilog datestamping Troy Morrison
- Re: multilog datestamping Russ Allbery
- Re: multilog datestamping Russ Allbery
- Re: multilog datestamping Mark Delany
- Re: multilog datestamping Russ Allbery
- Re: multilog datestamping Mark Delany
- Re: multilog datestamping Charles Cazabon
- Re: multilog datestamping Bruce Guenter
- Re: qmail logging tools Charles Cazabon
- Re: qmail logging tools Bruce Guenter
- Semd multipart messages wit... Carlo Gibertini
