On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 10:20:32AM +0100, Pavel Kankovsky wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Ilya wrote:
>
> > From: =?koi8-r?B?5/Xz8CBcIuLB28jMxcLP0NTJw8XQ0s/NXCI=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Qmail generate:
> > Return-Path: <"?�?? �???�?��???�???�? <Gusp"@ufatel.ru>>>
>
> Are you sure this piece of junk was generated by qmail?
>
> > Return-Path: <"?�?? �???�?��???�???�? <Gusp"@ufatel.ru>>>
> > Received: (qmail 9238 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2000 04:21:21 -0000
> > Received: from unknown (HELO rustam) (192.168.110.3)
> > by ms.ufatel.ru with SMTP; 12 Jan 2000 04:21:21 -0000
> > Message-ID: <000e01bf5cc5$50964000$036ea8c0@rustam>
> > From: =?koi8-r?B?5/Xz8CBcIuLB28jMxcLP0NTJw8XQ0s/NXCI=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The message was received via SMTP. The bogus return path was supplied by
> SMTP client (MS Outlook? oh, what surprise!). Hmm...yes, it is somewhat
> questionable whether it is a good thing that qmail is willing to accept
> such garbage at all and waste resources trying to deliver it (and be
> blamed for breaking it in the end).
Well how would qmail decide that that address is potentially bogus?
I don't know. That address is, even, potentially _valid_.
Greetz, Peter.
--
Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder
|
| 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot;
| C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.'
| Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++
