On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Return-Path: <"?Ó?? Á???ë?áî???ö???î? <Gusp"@ufatel.ru>>> > Well how would qmail decide that that address is potentially bogus? > I don't know. That address is, even, potentially _valid_. It is not. "ufatel.ru>>" has never been a valid domain name. And I hope it will never be a valid name. --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ] "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
- Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? Ilya
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? petervd
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? petervd
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? Ilya
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? petervd
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? Anand Buddhdev
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? Ilya
- Re: Bad Return-Path: Qmail bag? petervd
