On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 02:05:11PM -0600, Scott D. Yelich wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > (1) I complained about a guy's 17 line signature that could > be compressed down to 4 lines... he complained about my 9 > line PGP signature. clue. > Well I have to admit I have some sympathy with him there, I'd much prefer that people *didn't* post PGP signed messages where it isn't necessary. It's just extra noise that has to be filtered out by some means or other. Why should I have to set up my MUA to handle something that isn't necessary for me - it's similar to HTML in many ways. -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Kai MacTane
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful rogers-qmail
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Peter van Dijk
- Re: HTML mail considered harmf... Andy Bradford
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Ronny Haryanto
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Kai MacTane
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Peter van Dijk
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Scott D. Yelich
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Martin Randall
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Scott D. Yelich
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Bruno Wolff III
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Duncan Watson
