On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 09:42:10AM +0100, > > Horses for courses, PGP has its place but not on mailing lists for > example. I disagree. It can be important to establish you always sign messages to lend credibility for when you want to deny posting/sending some message. PGP signed messages will generally have less extra stuff, than the multipart alternative messages typically used for html. However it would be nice if people used the rfc 2015 standard when using it, so that MIME aware readers could hide the signature.
- Re: HTML mail considered harmf... Andy Bradford
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Ronny Haryanto
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Kai MacTane
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Peter van Dijk
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Scott D. Yelich
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Martin Randall
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Scott D. Yelich
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Bruno Wolff III
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Chris Green
- Re: HTML mail considered harmful Duncan Watson
