On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 10:04:36AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 09:42:10AM +0100,
> >
> > Horses for courses, PGP has its place but not on mailing lists for
> > example.
>
> I disagree. It can be important to establish you always sign messages to
> lend credibility for when you want to deny posting/sending some message.
>
> PGP signed messages will generally have less extra stuff, than the multipart
> alternative messages typically used for html.
>
> However it would be nice if people used the rfc 2015 standard when using it,
> so that MIME aware readers could hide the signature.
Yes, OK, I'll go for that! If I don't see the extra junk I'm not to
fussed about it as it doesn't use much bandwidth.
As it is the PGP stuff just annoys me at about the same level as
excessive sigs do, somewhat but not enough to really scream about.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
