> It works exactly the same as SSL and IMAP. You can encapsulate any > TCP connection in an SSL tunnel. This includes IMAP, POP3, telnet, or > even ssh or another SSL session, although the last two are pretty > pointless. May anyone explain me what sense a SSL tunnel for POP3 does have (I've been wondering about that for long...)? I mean as long as SMTP isn't encrypted the message already WAS unencrypted on the net so why should I encrypt anything beside the password of the user which can be done using APOP. As already said, if anyone wants to secure the content of its mails, he will have to use PGP! Best regards, Gabriel
- The most secure POP server Roberto Samarone Ara�jo (RSA)
- Re: The most secure POP server Irwan Hadi
- RE: The most secure POP server Irwan Hadi
- Re: The most secure POP server Adam McKenna
- Re: The most secure POP server Adam McKenna
- RE: The most secure POP server Brett Randall
- RE: The most secure POP server amir
- RE: The most secure POP server Dave Granath
- Re: The most secure POP server Brian D. Winters
- Re: The most secure POP server Mark Mentovai
- Re: Re[2]: The most secure POP ... Gabriel Ambuehl
- Re: Re[2]: The most secure ... Johan Almqvist
- Re: Re[2]: The most secure ... Scott Gifford
- Re[4]: The most secure... Gabriel Ambuehl
- Re: Re[4]: The mos... Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The... Joe Kelsey
- Re: Re[4]: The... clemensF
- Re: Re[4]: The... Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The... clemensF
- Re: Re[4]: The... Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The... clemensF
