On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 07:38:30PM +0200, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > May anyone explain me what sense a SSL tunnel for POP3 does have (I've > been wondering about that for long...)? I mean as long as SMTP > isn't encrypted the message already WAS unencrypted on the net so > why should I encrypt anything beside the password of the user which > can be done using APOP. As already said, if anyone wants to > secure the content of its mails, he will have to use PGP! As long as all users on a mail server are either behind the same firewall as the server or connecting with TLS (both SMTP and POP/IMAP) then local mail on that server can be regarded secure. IE for extranet purposes, there is a point. -Johan -- Johan Almqvist
- Re: The most secure POP server Irwan Hadi
- RE: The most secure POP server Irwan Hadi
- Re: The most secure POP server Adam McKenna
- Re: The most secure POP server Adam McKenna
- RE: The most secure POP server Brett Randall
- RE: The most secure POP server amir
- RE: The most secure POP server Dave Granath
- Re: The most secure POP server Brian D. Winters
- Re: The most secure POP server Mark Mentovai
- Re[2]: The most secure POP server Gabriel Ambuehl
- Re: Re[2]: The most secure POP server Johan Almqvist
- Re: Re[2]: The most secure POP server Scott Gifford
- Re[4]: The most secure POP server Gabriel Ambuehl
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP serv... Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP ... Joe Kelsey
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP ... clemensF
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP ... Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP ... clemensF
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP ... Scott Gifford
- Re: Re[4]: The most secure POP ... clemensF
- Re: The most secure POP server clemensF
