i need to unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] from this list as he is no longer a user at this server. please help. regards, mark On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Erwin Hoffmann wrote: > Hi again, > > At 22:37 4.7.2000 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >Erwin Hoffmann wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> since I'm dealing with the SPAMCONTROL patch, I would like to comment your > >> problem: > >> > >> 1. You are right. Within the filtering mechanisms a logical "AND" scheme is > >> missing. To implement this requires some attention. > >> > >> 2. Principally the following checks could be applied: > >> > >> Logic: > >> a) The envelope's MAIL FROM: address has to be taken. > >> b) From TCPENV the REMOTEIP has to be taken (=> real Sender IP) > >> c) By means of a DNS A-Lookup(MAIL FROM: address) the (let's call it) > >> pretended IP address has to be evaluated. > >> > >> Assumption: > >> For legitamate E-Mails both IP addresses belong (usually) to the same IP > >> subnet. However, one has to define a range of significant IP address bits > >> to evaluate (common in the CIDR scheme). > > > >Unfortunatly this assumption is pretty much flawed. For example I have > >two IP ranges, 195.134.128/19 and 62.48.0.0/19. Now my customers are > >usually in the 195 range but my mail servers are in the 62 range. So > >how do you propose to handle that? > > Yes, I know about that. The other attempt is to use static IP adresses as > Markus' proposed. Both schemes could be combined. Let's assume we have an > additional control file ./stmpallowedfrom: > > hotmail.com:195.111.222.200/19 (address range) > fehcom.de:195.162.195.1,195.162.195.2 (list of static ip addresses) > > This would give you some possibilty without the need to really now what are > the IP adresses of an SMTP sender. The address parsing is a little tricky. > > > eh. > > > > >> Result: > >> => Comparing both IP addresses would effectively eliminate reception of > >> E-mail thru 3rd party relays, as in your case. > >> > >> I think about but don't promise anything. There are other items on my > agenda. > > > >-- > >Andre > > > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | fff hh http://www.fehcom.de Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | > | ff hh | > | ff eee hhhh ccc ooo mm mm mm Wiener Weg 8 | > | fff ee ee hh hh cc oo oo mmm mm mm 50858 Koeln | > | ff ee eee hh hh cc oo oo mm mm mm | > | ff eee hh hh cc oo oo mm mm mm Tel 0221 484 4923 | > | ff eeee hh hh ccc ooo mm mm mm Fax 0221 484 4924 | > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ >
Re: spam and well known smtp servers
Cerberus - the Guardian of Hades Wed, 05 Jul 2000 04:46:39 -0700
- Re: spam and we... Eric Cox
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... Rogerio Brito
- Re: spam and well known smtp... clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Cyril Bitterich
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... David Benfell
- Re: spam and well known smtp... clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Andre Oppermann
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: spam and well known smtp... Cerberus - the Guardian of Hades
- Re: spam and well known ... Paul Jarc
