i need to unsubscribe:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

from this list as he is no longer a user at this server. please help.

regards,
mark

On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:

> Hi again,
> 
> At 22:37 4.7.2000 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> since I'm dealing with the SPAMCONTROL patch, I would like to comment your
> >> problem:
> >> 
> >> 1. You are right. Within the filtering mechanisms a logical "AND" scheme is
> >> missing. To implement this requires some attention.
> >> 
> >> 2. Principally the following checks could be applied:
> >> 
> >> Logic:
> >> a) The envelope's MAIL FROM: address has to be taken.
> >> b) From TCPENV the REMOTEIP has to be taken (=> real Sender IP)
> >> c) By means of a DNS A-Lookup(MAIL FROM: address) the (let's call it)
> >> pretended IP address has to be evaluated.
> >> 
> >> Assumption:
> >> For legitamate E-Mails both IP addresses belong (usually) to the same IP
> >> subnet. However, one has to define a range of significant IP address bits
> >> to evaluate (common in the CIDR scheme).
> >
> >Unfortunatly this assumption is pretty much flawed. For example I have
> >two IP ranges, 195.134.128/19 and 62.48.0.0/19. Now my customers are
> >usually in the 195 range but my mail servers are in the 62 range. So
> >how do you propose to handle that?
> 
> Yes, I know about that. The other attempt is to use static IP adresses as
> Markus' proposed. Both schemes could be combined. Let's assume we have an
> additional control file ./stmpallowedfrom:
> 
> hotmail.com:195.111.222.200/19                (address range)
> fehcom.de:195.162.195.1,195.162.195.2         (list of static ip addresses)
> 
> This would give you some possibilty without the need to really now what are
> the  IP adresses of an SMTP sender. The address parsing is a little tricky.
> 
> 
> eh.
> 
> >
> >> Result:
> >> => Comparing both IP addresses would effectively eliminate reception of
> >> E-mail thru 3rd party relays, as in your case.
> >> 
> >> I think about but don't promise anything. There are other items on my
> agenda.
> >
> >-- 
> >Andre
> >
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |  fff        hh         http://www.fehcom.de        Dr. Erwin Hoffmann |
> | ff          hh                                                        |
> | ff    eee   hhhh      ccc   ooo    mm mm  mm       Wiener Weg 8       |
> | fff  ee ee  hh  hh   cc   oo   oo  mmm  mm  mm     50858 Koeln        |
> | ff  ee eee  hh  hh  cc   oo     oo mm   mm  mm                        |
> | ff  eee     hh  hh   cc   oo   oo  mm   mm  mm     Tel 0221 484 4923  |
> | ff   eeee   hh  hh    ccc   ooo    mm   mm  mm     Fax 0221 484 4924  |
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> 

Reply via email to