> Cyril Bitterich: > But there is a good Point in you proposal. Maybe you just wanted to > reject the mail with a notification that you do not accept this mail > because they are not sent via Hotmail. that's dangerous. my experience told me never to answer suspect spammers. clemens
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... Charles Cazabon
- Re: spam and well known smtp... Markus Stumpf
- Re: spam and well known ... Eric Cox
- Re: spam and well k... John Conover
- Re: spam and we... wolfgang zeikat
- Re: spam and we... clemensF
- Re: spam and we... Eric Cox
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... Rogerio Brito
- Re: spam and well known smtp... clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Cyril Bitterich
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... David Benfell
- Re: spam and well known smtp... clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Andre Oppermann
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: spam and well known smtp... Cerberus - the Guardian of Hades
- Re: spam and well known ... Paul Jarc
