> David Benfell: > As I recall, the argument is that by responding, you confirm that the > e-mail address is valid. I can't say I've dealt with enough spam to > have relevant experience. i've had spamming for just surfing around the 'net, and it grew worse occasionally when i tried to avoid it by mailing abuse@... or postmaster@... clemens
- Re: spam and well known ... Eric Cox
- Re: spam and well k... John Conover
- Re: spam and we... wolfgang zeikat
- Re: spam and we... clemensF
- Re: spam and we... Eric Cox
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... Rogerio Brito
- Re: spam and well known smtp... clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Cyril Bitterich
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... David Benfell
- Re: spam and well known smtp... clemensF
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: spam and well known smtp servers Andre Oppermann
- Re: spam and well known smtp ser... Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: spam and well known smtp... Cerberus - the Guardian of Hades
- Re: spam and well known ... Paul Jarc
