On Aug 17 2000, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> I'd agree for simply changing the schedule (assuming the new
> algorithm isn't more complicated). My response was to a proposal
> for making the schedule *variable* by message.
Oh, sorry for responding to a different matter (I confess that
I read that pretty quickly without paying as much attention as
I should).
I'd imagine that yes, each message having its own retry
schedule would really blow the complexity without limits (each
message having a data structure to describe its schedule?)
So, we do agree on that. And I just love the KISS principle.
[]s, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/nectar/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
