On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 03:27:35PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Hmm. A more devious hack might be to adjust the mtime of the info file to be > >time() + QMAILQUEUELIFETIME - control/queuelifetime. The cost would be > >much closer to zero then - albeit at the cost of a misleading info file... > > And qmail-send would be using the tail end of the usual retry > schedule, not the front end. Yeah, but apart from these really good counterpoints, what else is wrong with my suggestion? (with apologies to Mr Cleese). Regards.
- Re: Queue Time Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Queue Time David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Queue Time Michael T. Babcock
- Re: Queue Time David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Queue Time Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Queue Time markd
- Re: Queue Time Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Queue Time markd
- Re: Queue Time Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Queue Time Dave Sill
- Re: Queue Time markd
- Re: Queue Time Rogerio Brito
- Re: Queue Time David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Queue Time Rogerio Brito
- determing local path Duane L.
- Re: determing local path Magnus Bodin
- Re: Queue Time Michael T. Babcock
- Re: Queue Time Rogerio Brito
- Re: Queue Time richard
- Re: Queue Time markd
- Re: Queue Time richard
