Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > You called the docs "highly inadequate", not "a little lacking when it > comes to helping someone completely new to qmail". In my > book, calling > something highly inadequate *is* calling it bad. Now, we are getting into a matter of semantics. It was not my intention to say the documentation was bad. I would say that your documentation is actually, better than what comes with qmail. However, I do still see it as lacking where a new user is concerned. Jamin W. Collins
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Amitai Schlair
- RE: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) John W. Lemons III
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Matt Brown
- RE: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) John W. Lemons III
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Aaron L. Meehan
- RE: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) John W. Lemons III
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Matt Brown
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Scott D. Yelich
- RE: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Dave Sill
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Henning Brauer
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Jamin Collins
- Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Mark Delany
- RE: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Tim Hunter
- RE: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Jamin Collins
- Fw: List Courtesy (was Newbie question) Andy KKS
