I am sure everyone can agree on this.
Constructive criticism works best, makes it much easier to fix how it lacks
if told how it lacks.
If you think the documentation sucks, PLEASE tell Dave (or Dan, or whatever
else documentation you are reading) that it sucks and why it sucks, and if
your really feeling useful fix it for them or give them some pointers.
That's why free software and support are good.
-- Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jamin Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 2:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: List Courtesy (was Newbie question)
>
>
> Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > You called the docs "highly inadequate", not "a little lacking when it
> > comes to helping someone completely new to qmail". In my
> > book, calling
> > something highly inadequate *is* calling it bad.
>
> Now, we are getting into a matter of semantics. It was not my
> intention to
> say the documentation was bad. I would say that your documentation is
> actually, better than what comes with qmail. However, I do still
> see it as
> lacking where a new user is concerned.
>
> Jamin W. Collins
>
