On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:26:21AM +0000, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
> >
> > One comment: if smtproutes is compatible with mailroutes, why not use
> > smtproutes instead of mailroutes?
>
> Because the name is too confining... It implies smtp. mail is more generic
> :)
> But I still prefer having smtp and qmtp separately (keeping the good
> tradition of the multiple qmail conf files)
But what about precedence as Johan mentioned earier?
(e.g. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
What could be done is to use BOTH smtproutes and mailroutes. Then it's sort
of backwards compatible. smtproutes will be read first. Then mailroutes. I
don't have an opinion about precedence here, but at least a smtproutes-file
would not be ignored. Which is most important.
A future qmail needs a qmail-lint shipped with it. As djbdns today ships
with nice tools like dnstrace, there is a definitive need for
trace/lint-tools for qmail.
/magnus
--
http://x42.com/
