On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:40:04PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > My favourit still is: single file called smtproutes. Maybe add an option
> > that if smtproutes don't exist and there is a mailroutes use that instead.
> > backward compatibility is a must, so smtproutes must be read.
>
> That I can accept. mailroutes (for smtp and qmtp routes) and smtproutes,
> mailroutes has priority over smtproutes?
No, opposite: smtproutes has priority over mailroutes. Backwards compatibility...
> Everyone OK with that?
I think you will be ok, because people who want two files can use
mailroutes for qmtproutes... :)
Summary:
- smtproutes is processed. If found there, use it and stop.
- mailroutes is processed.
this is backwards compatible. If you have confliting rules, then remove
the confliting rules from smtproutes and use mailroutes.
Best regards.
--
Pedro Melo Cunha - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Novis - Dir. Rede - ISP - Infraes. Portal <http://www.novis.pt/>
Ed. Atrium Saldanha - Pça. Dq. Saldanha, 1 - 7º / 1050-094 Lisboa
tel: +351 21 0104340 - Fax: +351 21 0104301
