Hi
My favourit still is: single file called smtproutes. Maybe add an option
that if smtproutes don't exist and there is a mailroutes use that instead.
backward compatibility is a must, so smtproutes must be read.
Best regards.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:42:07PM +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:21:25PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > If people prefer two files, then this is what I find best...
> > I still prefer a single file, called smtproutes, though.
> > > My preference is for seperate files to specify artificial routes for
> > > smtp and qmtp, and for the instructions in qmtproutes to be processed
> > > first, thereby winning in any conflict situation.
>
> There may be situations when we want to force smtp over qmtp, and that's
> not possible with the two-files design if there's a wildcard in
> qmtproutes. It's an off chance that somebody would want to do this, but I
> feel uncomfortable about doing it...
>
> -Johan
> --
> Johan Almqvist
> http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
--
Pedro Melo Cunha - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Novis - Dir. Rede - ISP - Infraes. Portal <http://www.novis.pt/>
Ed. Atrium Saldanha - Pça. Dq. Saldanha, 1 - 7º / 1050-094 Lisboa
tel: +351 21 0104340 - Fax: +351 21 0104301
