On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:18:10PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > I'm considering removing the entire patches section from > www.qmail.org. > > Why? Because a patch implies that something is wrong, and needs to be > fixed. However, when someone produces a "patch" for smtp-auth, that > implies that qmail-smtpd has a problem that the patch fixes. I'd > rather see people steal the necessary parts of Makefile, and Dan's > library code, and create a stand-alone "qmail-smtpd-auth" program. I'd just rename it from patches to "additional functionality" or something like that. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Chris Garrigues
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Dave Sill
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Tony Campisi
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Robin S. Socha
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Jonathan J. Smith
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Dave Sill
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: A firestorm of protest? David L. Nicol
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Greg Cope
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Jerry Lynde
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Henning Brauer
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Jurjen Oskam
- RE: A firestorm of protest? Greg Owen
- RE: A firestorm of protest? Andrew Richards
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Martin Randall
- RE: A firestorm of protest? Laurence Brockman
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Robin S. Socha
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Andy Bradford
- RE: A firestorm of protest? Russell Nelson
- RE: A firestorm of protest? Peter Cavender