On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 09:16:54AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Markus Stumpf wrote: > > > If AOL or hotmail would decide to change their MX records to your mailserver > > this will for sure also cause you problems. > > Actually, Qmail works fine as an incoming MX for Hotmail.com. > mail.hotmail.com, one of Hotmail's incoming mx machines, runs Qmail. [1] [snip] > [1] Qmail's fingerprint is that it accepts the > MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the SMTP session being shortened > to MAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The mail.hotmail.com that I just telnetted to on port 25 did not except this shortened version. It was also completely unsimilar to qmail-smtpd. Greetz, Peter.
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Markus Stumpf
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX ... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Markus Stumpf
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Scott Gifford
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Ha... Markus Stumpf
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re... Scott Gifford
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... qmail
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Ha... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... paul
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Mark Delany
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Charles Cazabon
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Virginia Chism
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- The joy of Qmail qmail
- Re: The joy of Qmail Charles Cazabon
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX ... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Dave Sill
