"Patrick Bihan-Faou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the "qmail security
>challenge".
>
>http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html
>
>
>If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a
>bug...

Sure, it's a bug. Dan didn't anticipate that spammers would set up
MX's pointing to 0.0.0.0. But it's not a security bug, and it wouldn't 
have won the Security Challenge if it was still in effect.

-Dave

Reply via email to