Scott Gifford wrote:
> Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Chris McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I'm wondering what the consequences of breaking QSBMF are. My
> > >desire is to change the bounce messages to something more
> > >professional (we've had some complaints)
> >
> > Seriously? Sheesh.
>
> We got similar complaints for our mail system.
Every site that I've set up loves it. I've reworded it in some cases to
be more informative than it is by default (yes, more), and use similar
wording in my version of qmail-notify (to notify users of delayed
delivery -- the right way to handle delivery notification).
Anyone who doesn't like the qmail wording surely can't be asking for the
old sendmail system back ... I've had _hundreds_ (if not thousands) of
users beg me to tell them what "this stupid message from MAILER-DAEMON
is." I've had nobody ask me what the "I'm sorry it didn't work out"
message was.
--
Michael T. Babcock (PGP: 0xBE6C1895)
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/
