Ketan Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sent messages to bad_user_names @yahoo.com, hotmail.com. My qmail logs show
> that they bounce back immediately, with a error code 554 and 550
> respectively.  which is the correct and expected behaviour.

It's correct, but why is it expected?  It's only possible if the process which
accepts the message from the net at large has knowledge of the final delivery
target.  This is the case sometimes, and other times not.

> No i try again to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED], i get a
> 250_ok (remote accepted message) !!! (they should have bounced back).

qmail-smtpd doesn't have any knowledge of local users.  It therefore cannot
reject the message during the initial SMTP conversation.  It then bounces the
message if the local user turns out not to exist.

This is all allowed by the SMTP spec.

> as you've mentioned : you see the accept message and followed by a bounce.
> what i could be possibly missing? is it some sort of qmail-remote
> configuration??

No, it's not a configuration issue.  You simply don't understand that this is
also correct and allowed behaviour, and for obvious reasons, it has to be.
There are many network and software configurations which simply make it
impossible to "know" during the inital SMTP conversation whether the local
part of an address is valid.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to