"q question" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I was appalled when [Charles] said "please don't post BIND zonefiles >to Dan's lists". That is a blanket directive that is not necessarily >shared by everyone on this list, certainly not me. directive <> request >A few lines of zone records speaks volumes for BINDthinkers and they are >well worth the space in the email. BINDthinkers are WRONGthinkers. djbdnsthinkers are RIGHTthinkers. :-) Zone files are as welcome here as sendmail.cf's: not very. DJB went to a great deal of effort to free us from crapware like Sendmail and BIND. Please show him a little respect. -Dave
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Colin Palmer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Henning Brauer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Henning Brauer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Dave Sill
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Henning Brauer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Robin S. Socha
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? John Hogan
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Adam McKenna
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Dave Sill
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Kris von Mach
- remove Dave Schultz