>From: "Dave Sill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Can MX record be CNAME?
>Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 08:32:58 -0400
>
>"q question" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I was appalled when [Charles] said "please don't post BIND zonefiles
> >to Dan's lists". That is a blanket directive that is not necessarily
> >shared by everyone on this list, certainly not me.
>
>directive <> request
>
> >A few lines of zone records speaks volumes for BINDthinkers and they are
> >well worth the space in the email.
>
>BINDthinkers are WRONGthinkers. djbdnsthinkers are RIGHTthinkers. :-)
>
>Zone files are as welcome here as sendmail.cf's: not very. DJB went to
>a great deal of effort to free us from crapware like Sendmail and
>BIND. Please show him a little respect.
>
>-Dave
I have shown respect for DJB and everyone on this list. I am looking very
seriously at installing djbdns, and I'm sure that djbdns is in fact probably
going to show itself to be superior to BIND.
BINDthinkers cannot just jump blindly into djbdnsthink. There are going to
be a few posts now and again where someone is going to show a few zone
records to clarify their point while they transition into qmail/djbdns/etc.
Noone should say: "please don't post BIND zonefiles to Dan's lists". This
fellow only showed a few lines, not his entire zonefile. I made one simple
request to Charles not to shut down this kind of information and received
arguments from Charles which I responded to. In the process of responding to
the arguments generated by Charles, I have been accused wrongly of being
off-topic.
END OF DISCUSSION
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
