J=F6rgen Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There's been 4 similar reports of qmail-remote not behaving properly t=
o
>this list during the last month.=20
>
>http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg00558.=
html
>http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/05/msg01332.=
html
>http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/06/msg00283.=
html
>http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/06/msg00426.=
html
>
>We still haven't been able to help any of them...
>
>This doesn't look like a coincidence to me since two of the reports
>concerned the same recipient server (outblaze.com). Unfortunately it
>seems related to network programming, which I know very little about.
>
>Any other thoughts about this=3F
Three of the four are running Red Hat 6.2. That could simply be
because 75% of qmail systems are running RH 6.2, though. :-)
No word on which qmail patches, if any, were installed on these
systems.
-Dave
