"MarkD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And one wonders why inode isn't suggested instead of count to > completely avoid collisions. Suppose you tar up a maildir, and then untar it later. The inodes will change, so new deliveries might collide with old messages. paul
- maildir delivery details Paul Jarc
- Re: maildir delivery details Charles Cazabon
- Re: maildir delivery details Paul Jarc
- Re: maildir delivery details MarkD
- out of memory :) Cecilia Cabrera
- Re: out of memory :) Ross Cooney
- Re: out of memory :) Adrian Ho
- Re: maildir delivery details Paul Jarc
- Re: maildir delivery details MarkD
- Re: maildir delivery details Paul Jarc
- Re: maildir delivery details Charles Cazabon
- Re: maildir delivery details MarkD
- Re: maildir delivery details Paul Jarc
- Re: maildir delivery details Peter van Dijk
