On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 03:57:37PM +0000, Cecilia Cabrera wrote:
> So,there it is. One question remains though: is it reasonable that qmaild
> calls qmail-queue instead of qmailq?
Yes. qmail-smtpd (more correctly, the tcpserver instance that runs
qmail-smtpd) runs as qmaild.
> Our is something else wrong?
Two possibilities I can think of:
[1] The permissions on qmail-queue-real were mangled during the copy.
It should be setuid qmailq, exec by all.
[2] The amavis script needs to run some stuff as user qmailq. I don't
use amavis myself, but setuid scripts don't setuid on any *nix
variant I've seen. If amavis is depending on this, a setuid binary
wrapper is required.
--
Adrian Ho Tinker, Drifter, Fixer, Bum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListArchive: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail>
Useful URLs: <http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html> <http://www.qmail.org>
<http://www.lifewithqmail.org/> <http://qmail.faqts.com/>
