Re: QMQP may eat your mail and its bounces

[Dave Sill]

Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Fri, 07 Sep 2001, Dave Sill wrote:
>
>> QMQP requires fewer round trips. For high-latency connections, this
>> could be important.
>
>You don't usually have high-latency and pre-authentication on the same
>link. High-latency connections can still use ESMTP PIPELINING which is
>there.

Pipelined SMTP still requires more round trips than QMQP.

>> Non-RFC-compliant mail is not innocent.
>
>Hu? No-one said QMQP would require RFC-compliant mail. qmail-remote is
>the only place that mentions this. qmail-inject silently fixes missing
>newlines. So what?

So it's a documentation bug, at worst.

-Dave