Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME

[Matthias Andree]

On Sun, 09 Sep 2001, Pavel Kankovsky wrote:

> You are both right and wrong. You are right because bounces have empty
> envelope senders aka return paths...or are supposed to have according
> to the RFCs. You are wrong because the *format* of bounces should be
> recognizable even after manipulation that do not preserve envelope
> senders--imagine a user forwarding a bounce to his/her postmaster.

Not exactly, a forward is a regular mail which includes another message,
either inlined, possibly quoted (not desirable in this particular case)
or as MIME object in a multipart/mixed container.

-- 
Matthias Andree